When WWE introduced the brand split, it gave Raw and SmackDown their own identities, rosters, championships and rivalries. It also created opportunities for more superstars to become important players rather than getting lost in an overcrowded roster.
However, WWE has regularly allowed superstars to appear across both brands, creating crossover matches, shared storylines and opportunities for unexpected interactions.
But has this taken away some of what made the brand split special?
Would WWE benefit from bringing back stricter rules, keeping Raw and SmackDown completely separate, or is having superstars cross between brands better for the product?
💬 Let's Debate!
Should Raw and SmackDown have completely separate rosters?
Should superstars only appear on their assigned brand unless officially traded?
Should each brand have its own exclusive championships?
Does the current crossover make WWE more entertaining?
Would a stricter brand split create more opportunities for the roster?
Which brand would have the stronger roster if the split was fully enforced?
Over to you! Should WWE bring back the brand split rules in full, or is the freedom to cross between brands better for business?
86Entertainment Group
GamingDNA - GamingDNA is the place for gamers to come together and talk about everything gaming. From the latest gaming news and releases to consoles, PC gaming, reviews and industry discussions, there's something for every type of gamer.
The Smark Report - Where wrestling fans come together! The Smark Report is dedicated to the world of professional wrestling, covering WWE, AEW, TNA and promotions from around the globe. Discuss the latest shows, debate the biggest talking points and relive wrestling's greatest moments.